Fetching latest headlinesโ€ฆ
HCC V28 Transition Timeline & Phase-In Impact
NORTH AMERICA
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United Statesโ€ขJuly 1, 2026

HCC V28 Transition Timeline & Phase-In Impact

0 views0 likes0 comments
Originally published byDev.to

V28 didn't replace V24 overnight. CMS blends the two models over multiple payment years, which means for the duration of the transition your RAF is a weighted mix of two models. If your pipeline treats the switch as a flag flip, your numbers are wrong.

The blend, conceptually

blended_RAF = w_v28 * RAF_v28 + w_v24 * RAF_v24
# w_v28 increases each payment year until V28 is 100%

The exact weights per payment year are set in the CMS Rate Announcement.

Re-read it for the actual year โ€” do not hard-code last year's split.

What that does to your data

  • YoY RAF deltas are contaminated. Part of any year-over-year change is just w_v28 increasing. Decompose every trend into model shift vs. true population/documentation shift, or your dashboards mislead.
  • Two engines, not one. You must compute both RAF_v24 and RAF_v28 for every member through the entire blend, then weight. Retire V24 only when its weight reaches zero.
  • Category drift. Some conditions that paid under V24 don't under V28; documentation that was sufficient before can under-capture now. Re-baseline historical members under the V28 model to see your real exposure. A category-by-category view of the V24-vs-V28 differences helps you spot which families to watch.

Minimal ops checklist

  1. Load both coefficient/crosswalk sets, keyed by payment year.
  2. Compute V24 + V28 per member; apply the year's blend weights.
  3. Report model-shift and true-shift as separate series.
  4. Re-score history under V28 for a clean baseline.
  5. Re-verify weights and category counts against the current CMS Rate Announcement.

A side-by-side of the remap โ€” plus a tool that computes a member under both models, so you can see the blend's effect on a real case โ€” is here: HCC V28.

The point of all this is accuracy under the correct blended model for the payment year โ€” not chasing a higher number.

Not coding, billing, or clinical advice. Phase-in weights change by payment year โ€” confirm against the current CMS Rate Announcement.

Written by Chin Ramamoorthi โ€” CEO, VBC Risk Analytics. He has 20+ years across provider- and payer-side healthcare IT, including leading V24-to-V28 transition work on both the payer and provider side.

Reviewed by the VBC Risk Analytics Risk Adjustment & Coding Team.

Last updated: July 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

Be the first to comment!